New Bedford Board of Health Votes to Deny Approval of Controversial Trash Transfer Facility

After months of hearings and deliberation, the New Bedford Board of Health voted against granting South Coast Renewables permission for the project

Christine Kelley, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said she was ‘ecstatic’ with the final decision.
Christine Kelley, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said she was ‘ecstatic’ with the final decision.
Paul C. Kelly Campos /Ocean State Media
Share
Christine Kelley, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said she was ‘ecstatic’ with the final decision.
Christine Kelley, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said she was ‘ecstatic’ with the final decision.
Paul C. Kelly Campos /Ocean State Media
New Bedford Board of Health Votes to Deny Approval of Controversial Trash Transfer Facility
Copy

The New Bedford Board of Health voted 2-to-1 Tuesday night to deny approval for a controversial trash transfer facility in the city’s North End, effectively killing the project as proposed.

The board cited multiple environmental and health issues brought up during recent community hearings as reasons for denying the project approval. The decision comes nearly six years after South Coast Renewables, formerly known as Parallel Products, initially proposed the project in 2019.

“I am just ecstatic that finally this is over,” said Christine Kelley, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United (SCNU). “We got the vote that we should have received.”

The facility would have sorted around 1,500 tons of solid waste per day, before sending it out for destruction or recycling elsewhere, which would have made New Bedford No. 1 in terms of trash facilities in Massachusetts.

Matt O’Donnell, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said he felt that the community’s consistent pressure on the issue over the last six years helped pressure the Board of Health to deny approval for the site.
Matt O’Donnell, a New Bedford resident and member of the advocacy group South Coast Neighbors United, said he felt that the community’s consistent pressure on the issue over the last six years helped pressure the Board of Health to deny approval for the site.
Paul C. Kelly Campos / Ocean State Media

“We helped show them that this site should not be approved,” said Matt O’Donnell, a New Bedford resident who has followed the issue for the last four years. “It should not be anywhere near houses.”

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection gave its approval to the trash transfer station in July. The city’s Board of Health hosted a series of public hearings at Casimir Pulaski Elementary School to solicit public comment and to discuss the potential health and environmental impacts of such a facility.

The company behind the proposal said it would work to limit the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. But local groups like SCNU said the transfer station would have led to unavoidable environmental and health impacts. The Board cited environmental and health concerns such as potential rat infestations, air pollutant risks for residents nearby and impacts on traffic congestion as key concerns.

The New Bedford Board of Health on Tuesday also moved to levy a $2,800 public hearing fee and a technical fee of $61,691.43.

South Coast Renewables can appeal the decision. It’s not yet clear if the company plans to do so.

Calls for civility and compassion from across the partisan spectrum
Bryan Jones, president of the Rhode Island FFA Association, formerly known as the Future Farmers of America, says local farmers are struggling with the high cost of land and a lack of legislative support
Meeting federal deadline supersedes climate goals
Here’s what to know about vaccine eligibility, state policy, and whether insurance will cover the shots
Broader probe into overcharges to residential, commercial customers due Nov. 15