The Public’s Radio

Medical Residents at Three Care New England Hospitals Vote to Unionize

The votes come a week after almost 700 of their colleagues at Rhode Island Hospital won their union election

The votes come a week after almost 700 of their colleagues at Rhode Island Hospital won their union election

Share
The Public’s Radio
Medical Residents at Three Care New England Hospitals Vote to Unionize
Copy

Medical residents employed by three Care New England hospitals voted Wednesday to unionize with Service Employees International Union’s Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR-SEIU).

Residents at Kent Hospital won their union election with 72.5% of the vote, 74-28. At Women and Infants they won their union election 40-8, or 83% of the vote. Finally, Butler residents won with 92% of the vote, 33-3. CIR-SEIU now represents about 230 residents at these hospitals, whether they voted for the union or not.

Residents organized on a platform of wages and benefits that more fairly reflect the fact that they can sometimes work 80 hours in a single week. The starting salaries at those hospitals, according to a spokesperson from CIR-SEIU, are $70,555 at Butler, $63,985 at Kent, and $66,978 at Women & Infants. Other residents who have organized with CIR-SEIU have seen their salaries rise by more than $15,000 after getting a first contract under a new union.

This story was reported by The Public’s Radio. You can read the entire story here.

Nova One kicks off our very first Biggest Little Desk: a Rhode Island spin of NPR’s Tiny Desk
Rodney Chatman is out after five years as Brown police chief. He’s succeeded by High Clements, who led the Providence police department for 12 years
Jon Mitchell points to gains in crime, schools and development, but sidesteps offshore wind slowdown and immigration concerns
From a show at AS220 to New Bedford’s film festival and a high-energy performance at Mundo’s, here’s what to do this weekend
While he says the state’s reputation as a hotbed of political corruption is overstated, Marion says government oversight today isn’t as ‘robust as it should be’