Finalists Announced to Replace Westbound Washington Bridge

Gov. Mckee cites progress on the anniversary of the emergency closing

Gov. McKee addresses reporters at the Statehouse.
Gov. McKee addresses reporters at the Statehouse.
Share
Gov. McKee addresses reporters at the Statehouse.
Gov. McKee addresses reporters at the Statehouse.
Finalists Announced to Replace Westbound Washington Bridge
Copy

Rhode Island Gov. Dan McKee marked the one-year anniversary of the emergency closing of the westbound side of the Washington Bridge by announcing two finalists to replace the structure and by asserting that things are going in the right direction after some initial missteps.

“It has been a difficult year for everyone impacted by the closure,” McKee said Tuesday, a day ahead of the anniversary, during a Statehouse news conference. “I know that, and I’m sorry we’ve had to go through this, but it was necessary. Like you, I certainly wish I had known sooner than December 11th that the bridge had serious issues.”

While it was not known until March 14 that the westbound Washington Bridge was beyond repair, McKee said, “Our goal has remained clear: build a new bridge, build it safely and build it right.”

The governor identified the finalists as the Walsh Group of Chicago and a joint venture between the American Bridge Company of Pennsylvania and MLJ Contracting Corp. of New York. Plans call for the finalist to be selected in June.

This story was reported by The Public’s Radio. You can read the entire story here.

A $300 million payment dispute and a 2024 blade failure fuel a high-stakes legal fight over the future of the project
Getting up the East Side once meant horses, cable cars and ingenuity. Now, it usually means walking
The power politics of a vacancy on Rhode Island’s highest court
The explosion, which sent 13 people to the hospital, was caused by ethanol vapors accumulating in an oven, according to the Rhode Island State Fire Marshal
Based in East Greenwich, Dewetron specializes in high-tech measurement equipment
Anonymous letters claimed a judge threw cases in favor of a prosecutor he was seeing romantically. A court-appointed investigator found no evidence to support the allegations