UNH Researchers Find Rural Votes Could Tip Swing States in Presidential Elections

Either party could carry a state if there is a small shift of votes in rural areas

Jason Moon/NHPR
Share
Jason Moon/NHPR
UNH Researchers Find Rural Votes Could Tip Swing States in Presidential Elections
Copy

Researchers at the University of New Hampshire have found that rural votes can make or break presidential elections.

Kenneth Johnson co-authored a study with UNH Professor Dante Scala, looking at what would happen if Democratic candidates gained or lost just 3% of rural votes across various swing states. They found that states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin could tip favorably toward either party by a small margin in those rural areas.

“Our point is just that you can’t ignore rural America,” Johnson said. “That rural America is still relevant even though it represents a small part of the vote.”

For the study, Johnson looked at rural voters in presidential elections from 2008 to 2020. Using the turnout from the 2020 election, the research team modeled what would happen if just 3% of people shifted their votes for a Democratic candidate in the 2024 election or voted otherwise.

“Democrats don’t have to win in rural America,” Johnson said. “They just have to get enough of the rural vote to allow their advantage in metropolitan areas to produce a majority. This motivates our research asking what would happen if a Democrat could 3% more or 3% less in rural areas of these seven battleground states in 2024.”

After the 2020 election, Johnson and Scala found that President Joe Biden won in swing states by bigger margins than former President Donald Trump in the 2016 election. They also found that Biden did better than Hillary Clinton in rural areas.

“Our point is just that you can’t ignore rural America. That rural America is still relevant even though it represents a small part of the vote.”
Kenneth Johnson

Johnson said that rural and urban voters are often pitted as a dichotomy, but he notes that rural voters across the nation often vote differently than their rural counterparts.

For instance, in most rural towns in America, Democrats do not constitute more than 50% of votes. However, in New Hampshire, Johnson said, Democrats can get the majority of both rural and urban votes.

“So in that sense New Hampshire is a little different than these battleground states where the Democrats never get the majority in a rural area,” Johnson said.

Johnson said that while rural voters do not make up the majority of the electorate, courting them counts.

This story was originally published by New Hampshire Public Radio. It was shared as part of the New England News Collaborative.

Gabriel Boomer Amaral, a Republican who has never held elected office in Fall River, took nearly 49% of the vote against the incumbent Democrat. Amaral is calling for a recount
The special election for Ward 2 was triggered by Helen Anthony’s retirement
Rhode Island’s SNAP program reveals sharp contrasts — from record-high enrollment to looming cuts that could deepen food insecurity
A coalition of mostly Rhode Island nonprofits and cities is urging a federal judge to require the Trump administration to issue full SNAP benefits, not the partial payments announced earlier this week
Believe it or not, there can be pretty significant carbon emissions from your pet’s food. This week on Possibly, we explain why, and show some easy ways to reduce your pet’s carbon “pawprint”
Following a federal judge’s order in Providence, the Trump administration says it will resume SNAP payments — but recipients will get only about half of their usual benefits