Trump’s Rollback of Ocean Protections Threatens Marine Life—and the Future of Fishing

Unsustainable fishing, not climate change, has been the biggest threat to ocean biodiversity for decades. Scientists warn that dismantling marine protected areas could accelerate the crisis for species, ecosystems, and coastal economies alike

Coral reefs provide nurseries for many fish species.
Coral reefs provide nurseries for many fish species.
Share
Coral reefs provide nurseries for many fish species.
Coral reefs provide nurseries for many fish species.
Trump’s Rollback of Ocean Protections Threatens Marine Life—and the Future of Fishing
Copy

The single greatest threat to the diversity of life in our oceans over the past 50 years, more than climate change or plastic pollution, has been unsustainable fishing practices.

In much of the ocean, there is little to no regulation or oversight of commercial fishing or other human activities. That’s part of the reason why about a tenth of marine plant and animal species are considered threatened or at risk.

It’s also why countries around the world have been creating marine protected areas.

These protected areas, covering over 11.6 million square miles (30 million square kilometers) in 16,000 locations, offer refuge away from human activities for a wide variety of living creatures, from corals to sea turtles and whales. They give fish stocks a place to thrive, and those fish spread out into the surrounding waters, which helps fishing industries and local economies.

In the U.S., however, marine protection is being dismantled by President Donald Trump.

Marine protected areas as of 2022. Fully or highly protected areas represented less than 3% of the ocean, according to the Marine Protection Atlas.
Marine protected areas as of 2022. Fully or highly protected areas represented less than 3% of the ocean, according to the Marine Protection Atlas.

Trump issued a proclamation on April 17, 2025, titled “Unleashing American commercial fishing in the Pacific,” ordering the removal of key protections to allow commercial fishing in parts of a nearly 500,000-square-mile marine protected area called the Pacific Island Heritage National Marine Monument.

He also called for a review of all other marine national monuments to decide if they should be opened to commercial fishing too. In addition, the Trump administration is proposing to redefine “harm” under the Endangered Species Act in a way that would allow for more damage to these species’ habitats.

Read the rest of the story on The Conversation.

‘AI is one of the most transformative technologies that we will all experience in our lifetime, and Rhode Island is being proactive’
The Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council praises slowing the rate of spending. It opposes raising taxes on millionaires
Find Rhode Island weekend events, including dance performances in East Greenwich, author talks, Providence restaurant week deals and a statewide brew fest
Life Science Hub CEO Mark Turco discusses job creation, competition and whether the state entered the biotech race too late
The stay marks the fourth time a federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration’s effort to halt offshore wind construction
State Rep. Megan Cotter has introduced legislation to incentivize school districts to build regional partnerships