A Potential $110B Economic Hit: How Trump’s Tariffs Could Mean Rising Costs for Families, Strain for States

The new Trump tariff regime represents a fundamental shift in how the U.S. engages with its closest economic partners.
The new Trump tariff regime represents a fundamental shift in how the U.S. engages with its closest economic partners.
wirestock/Envato
Share
The new Trump tariff regime represents a fundamental shift in how the U.S. engages with its closest economic partners.
The new Trump tariff regime represents a fundamental shift in how the U.S. engages with its closest economic partners.
wirestock/Envato
A Potential $110B Economic Hit: How Trump’s Tariffs Could Mean Rising Costs for Families, Strain for States
Copy

Get ready to pay more for avocados, maple syrup and – well – almost everything.

The U.S. officially imposed new 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico on March 4, 2025, following through on a long-delayed pledge from President Donald Trump. American consumers and businesses are now bracing for higher costs and potential supply disruptions.

Although tariffs, or taxes on imports, are a pillar of Trump’s economic policy, the move still surprised many observers, since Mexico and Canada are among the U.S.’s traditional allies and top trading partners. The administration further rattled global supply chains by doubling existing tariffs on Chinese goods to 20%.

As an economist who studies global trade, I wanted to know how the 25% import duties on Canada and Mexico would affect different parts of the country. So I conducted a state-by-state impact analysis.

What I found is alarming: The U.S. economy could face an annual loss of US$109.23 billion. This shortfall would mean rising costs of every day goods for American families and would disproportionately affect certain states. My analysis focused exclusively on the effects of U.S. tariffs, so it didn’t take retaliation from Canada or Mexico into account. If it did, the losses would be even greater.

Read more on The Conversation.

Judge calls the Justice Department’s request a “fishing expedition” for sensitive voter information
The city council approved the Providence Rent Stabilization Act on Thursday, which would have placed a 4% cap on annual rent increases for most Providence apartments
Officials project $38 million a year once tolling resumes, but spending obligations have outpaced revenue by millions
The Providence City Council is still one vote short of a supermajority that could override Mayor Brett Smiley’s expected veto. The policy would cap annual rent increases at 4% with exceptions for owner-occupants.
Mayor Ken Hopkins says a 7.4% tax increase is necessary to maintain city services and close the existing budget gap
Plus: the Rhode Island Black Film Festival, opening day at the drive-in and more