Smiley, Providence City Council clash over tenant protections in rental aid plan

The proposed RENT program would pay landlords up to $3,000 on behalf of struggling tenants, but councilors want safeguards against rent hikes and evictions

A sign advertising an apartment for rent is seen in Providence, R.I., on Oct. 17, 2024.
A sign advertising an apartment for rent is seen in Providence, R.I., on Oct. 17, 2024.
Jeremy Bernfeld/Ocean State Media
Share
A sign advertising an apartment for rent is seen in Providence, R.I., on Oct. 17, 2024.
A sign advertising an apartment for rent is seen in Providence, R.I., on Oct. 17, 2024.
Jeremy Bernfeld/Ocean State Media
Smiley, Providence City Council clash over tenant protections in rental aid plan
Copy

A rental assistance proposal by Providence Mayor Brett Smiley is facing scrutiny from the city council.

If approved, the RENT program would allow landlords to receive payments of up to $3,000 on behalf of cash-strapped tenants.

But Providence city councilor Jill Davidson says the measure doesn’t contain safeguards for the renters it’s supposed to help.

“There are no obligations on the part of a landlord to protect the tenant’s rights,” said Davidson. “So it could be that the tenant could ask for assistance and then have their rent raised at the nearest possible opportunity.”

Davidson says landlords who receive payments should be required to meet specific conditions, such as holding the line on rent or waiving a tenant’s late fees.

If a landlord ultimately evicts a tenant after receiving funding on their behalf, Davidson believes the money should be returned to the city. The proposal, in its current form, includes no such stipulations.

“We’re concerned about landlords that choose to raise rent as much as they wish,” said Davidson. “There are no protections right now that would prevent them from doing so.”

$1 million has already been set aside for the RENT program. The city council’s Special Committee on Ways and Means is expected to meet in the coming weeks to consider changes to the proposal.

Mayor Smiley sponsored the measure after vetoing a rent stabilization plan in April. He claims delaying the rollout of the RENT program is irresponsible.

“We should be providing relief to neighbors today, not in September or October,” said Smiley. “I am deeply disappointed that the City Council has decided to play political games while Providence families are the ones who will bear these consequences.”

Jill Davidson disagrees. In her mind, the council is simply doing its due diligence.

“I think everybody is trying to meet the huge, urgent, demonstrated need for renters in this city to not be priced out, evicted, and displaced, which is happening more and more in our neighborhoods,” said Davidson. “I think the question is what kind of response are you going to have to it.”

Davidson says she’s confident the city council and Mayor Smiley will find common ground on how to implement the RENT program. And while she supports the measure in principle, Davidson doesn’t think a $1 million rental assistance fund goes far enough.

“I would prefer to see a more sustainable response than a one-time program that will help a very small percentage of households with what is a very large and systemic problem,” said Davidson.

“We have to do something to protect renters and to create stability.”

In a series of short audio and video files he left behind, the shooter said he began planning the attack at Brown in 2022, the FBI said in a statement
Friday, May 15 from 5:30 - 7 p.m.
State Representative Brandon Potter of Cranston argues higher taxes on top earners could address inequality while funding health care and affordability needs
Los detenidos en la custodia del ICE reportan haber sido transfirado de repente y sin aviso, complicando sus casos de inmigración y forzando los abogados a luchar por asegurar el proceso debido
Charles Calenda’s 120-day term as interim US attorney expired. Democrats see his further appointment as an end-run around longstanding protocol
As Woonsocket’s incinerator winds down, Rhode Island must decide where its “biosolids” go next