Referendum Shows Most Undergraduate Respondents Oppose Brown University Leadership

The results of a new vote suggest many undergraduates lack faith in the school’s governing body

File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
Olivia Ebertz/The Public’s Radio
Share
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
Olivia Ebertz/The Public’s Radio
Referendum Shows Most Undergraduate Respondents Oppose Brown University Leadership
Copy

According to a referendum distributed by Brown’s Undergraduate Council of Students, 73% of undergraduate respondents are unhappy with Brown University’s corporate leadership and would like at least one person on the Brown Corporate Board representing undergraduates. The council said that 26% of the undergraduate student body responded to the referendum.

The students who conducted the referendum say it shows a deep divide between the student body and the university’s leadership, who have been at odds over pro-Palestinian activism on campus for over a year now. But Brian Clark, a spokesperson for the university, said the referendum offers the opinion of just “a portion of one specific group of constituents,” and underscored that the results do not require the school to take any action. Any changes to the structure of Brown’s governance would have to be approved by the current board, Clark said.

Isaac Slevin is a member of the Undergraduate Student Council. He said that besides showing students’ upset over the Brown Corporation’s decision not to divest from companies students say profit from human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories, the results also highlight that students would like more meaningful decision-making power, beyond being members of advisory bodies and other forms of campus governance that currently exist.

“There’s less incentive to engage in these performative committees,” said Slevin.

This story was reported by The Public’s Radio. You can read the entire story here.

From Ken Burns’ view on what we learn from history to new oversight on the Washington Bridge, a booming tourism report and Rhode Island’s latest political moves — here’s what’s making news this week, plus a few thoughts on baseball, public media, and Bulldogs’ soccer glory
As the federal government shutdown drags on, more than a million civilian workers are going without pay — forcing many middle-class families, from Maryland to Florida, to seek food aid and short-term loans just to get by
The second‐ranked Bulldogs (13-0-2) are coming off a scoreless draw at No. 1 Princeton Tigers and are gearing up for a crucial clash with defending champion Vermont Catamounts
Three Democrats and one Republican are now running to replace the term-limited AG in 2026 — with Ahern, a former prosecutor and Cannabis Control Commission chair, pledging to “fight for Rhode Islanders’ rights”
Latest earnings report offers little insight into costs associated with HQ relocation
Reed, Whitehouse, Magaziner and Amo say they’ll withhold their salaries until the government reopens, joining a growing bipartisan call for “no work, no pay” during shutdowns