Twenty-three attorneys general have asked for a two-week ban on a federal funding freeze in a draft temporary restraining order filed Thursday morning in U.S. District Court in Providence.
Twenty-three attorneys general have asked for a two-week ban on a federal funding freeze in a draft temporary restraining order filed Thursday morning in U.S. District Court in Providence.
S.Gnatiuk/Envato

Memo or No Memo, AGs File Request for a Two-Week Ban on Federal Funding Freeze

Share
Twenty-three attorneys general have asked for a two-week ban on a federal funding freeze in a draft temporary restraining order filed Thursday morning in U.S. District Court in Providence.
Twenty-three attorneys general have asked for a two-week ban on a federal funding freeze in a draft temporary restraining order filed Thursday morning in U.S. District Court in Providence.
S.Gnatiuk/Envato
Memo or No Memo, AGs File Request for a Two-Week Ban on Federal Funding Freeze
Copy

A revised proposal from the 23 Democratic attorneys general suing the Trump administration seeks to prevent federal agencies from freezing funds for at least two weeks, regardless of any prior or future White House budget memos.

The four-page document filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on Thursday came at the request of Chief Judge John McConnell Jr., who delayed making an official ruling in a virtual hearing Wednesday amid confusion over the eleventh-hour rescission of the federal budget memo. McConnell indicated he would grant the temporary restraining order preventing federal agencies from freezing funds, but asked the AGs to submit an updated proposal reflecting that the U.S. Office of Management and Budget documents had been retracted.

The original Jan. 28 lawsuit makes repeated references to the White House memo issued Monday night, citing the “irreparable harm” that a funding freeze would cause to state governments and agencies who depend on the $1 trillion in federal aid to fund critical operations and services. The new submission relies on the same assumptions but focuses on the federal administration’s intent to pause funds.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in a post on X on Wednesday clarified that while the document has been rescinded, the freeze itself had not been revoked.

Leavitt’s post was entered as evidence in court on Wednesday and is also referenced in AGs revised proposal for a restraining order.

“Defendants shall also be restrained and prohibited from reissuing, adopting, implementing, or otherwise giving effect to the OMB Directive under any other name or title or through any other Defendants (or agency supervised, administered, or controlled by any Defendant), such as the continued implementation identified by the White House Press Secretary statement of January 29, 2025,” the submission states.

The AGs have asked McConnell to block all federal agencies from freezing funds for at least 14 days, requiring the federal cabinet heads named as defendants to notify their employees, contractors and grant recipients in writing within two hours of a judge’s order. The request also allows for a 14-day extension on the ban “for good cause shown.”

Daniel Schwei, the U.S. Department of Justice attorney representing the federal administration has 24 hours to submit a response before McConnell will issue a ruling.

A federal judge in D.C. on Tuesday issued a temporary administrative stay in response to a separate lawsuit filed by a group of nonprofit, business and healthcare groups, preventing the Trump administration from freezing federal grants and aid until at least Feb. 3.

This story was originally published by the Rhode Island Current.

Gabriel Boomer Amaral, a Republican who has never held elected office in Fall River, took nearly 49% of the vote against the incumbent Democrat. Amaral is calling for a recount
The special election for Ward 2 was triggered by Helen Anthony’s retirement
Rhode Island’s SNAP program reveals sharp contrasts — from record-high enrollment to looming cuts that could deepen food insecurity
A coalition of mostly Rhode Island nonprofits and cities is urging a federal judge to require the Trump administration to issue full SNAP benefits, not the partial payments announced earlier this week
Believe it or not, there can be pretty significant carbon emissions from your pet’s food. This week on Possibly, we explain why, and show some easy ways to reduce your pet’s carbon “pawprint”
Following a federal judge’s order in Providence, the Trump administration says it will resume SNAP payments — but recipients will get only about half of their usual benefits