Tensions Flare at New Bedford Board of Health Meeting on Trash Transfer Site

The Board of Health in New Bedford heard experts discuss the potential impact of building a new waste facility

The hearing official in charge of the New Bedford Board of Health meeting quieted the crowd several times on Aug. 26, 2025.
The hearing official in charge of the New Bedford Board of Health meeting quieted the crowd several times on Aug. 26, 2025.
Paul C. Kelly Campos/The Public’s Radio
Share
The hearing official in charge of the New Bedford Board of Health meeting quieted the crowd several times on Aug. 26, 2025.
The hearing official in charge of the New Bedford Board of Health meeting quieted the crowd several times on Aug. 26, 2025.
Paul C. Kelly Campos/The Public’s Radio
Tensions Flare at New Bedford Board of Health Meeting on Trash Transfer Site
Copy

Throughout the hearing some in the auditorium shouted, “Just say no,” prompting the hearing official in charge of the New Bedford Board of Health meeting, Art Krieger, to warn the crowd to quiet down several times.

The crowd was there to hear discussion on a proposal by South Coast Renewables to build a new facility that would handle and sort around 1,500 tons of solid waste per day, before it’s sent out for destruction or recycling elsewhere.

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection gave its approval to the trash transfer station in July. Throughout August, the city Board of Health hosted a series of public hearings at Casimir Pulaski Elementary School to get public comment and to discuss the potential health and environmental impacts of such a facility.

At Tuesday’s hearing, South Coast Renewables, formerly known as Parallel Products, called on various experts to talk about traffic congestion studies and explain the strategies that would be used by the company to mitigate car queuing near the facility.

Garrett Tunison, an environmental scientist contracted by South Coast Renewables, explained his research that found the facility would not create excessive noise pollution that would impact wildlife — one of several issues environmental groups had previously raised about the facility.

Throughout August, the city Board of Health hosted a series of public hearings at Casimir Pulaski Elementary School to solicit public comment and discuss the potential health and environmental impacts of a waste facility.
Throughout August, the city Board of Health hosted a series of public hearings at Casimir Pulaski Elementary School to solicit public comment and discuss the potential health and environmental impacts of a waste facility.
Paul C. Kelly Campos/The Public’s Radio

Todd Thalhamer, a civil engineer who spoke on behalf of the environmental group the Conversation Law Foundation, said he’s concerned the facility will cause fire danger.

“It’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when you will have a fire. The industry has been experiencing a dramatic increase in fires at transfer stations and other facilities.” Thalhamer said. “The toxicity [from a fire] will have all sorts of volatile organic chemicals. You’re gonna have high levels of benzene and other known volatility chemicals that are known carcinogens.”

Peter Durning, a lawyer for South Coast Renewables, told the Board of Health that the company plans to use an advanced fire prevention system to mitigate those risks.

New Bedford’s Board of Health is slated to issue a final decision on the site by September 19.

Rhode Island’s SNAP program reveals sharp contrasts — from record-high enrollment to looming cuts that could deepen food insecurity
A coalition of mostly Rhode Island nonprofits and cities is urging a federal judge to require the Trump administration to issue full SNAP benefits, not the partial payments announced earlier this week
Believe it or not, there can be pretty significant carbon emissions from your pet’s food. This week on Possibly, we explain why, and show some easy ways to reduce your pet’s carbon “pawprint”
Following a federal judge’s order in Providence, the Trump administration says it will resume SNAP payments — but recipients will get only about half of their usual benefits