New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts

Rhode Island, Connecticut and Massachusetts were originally going to reveal the winning bid on Aug. 8.

Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
Share
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts
Copy

Officials in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut postponed naming winners of regional offshore wind contracts on Aug. 8.

Massachusetts officials said they are delaying the decision for one month to consider the effect of a recent federal grant made to New England states.

The grant will fund regional, on-shore transmission infrastructure for offshore wind.

The three states want to buy up to 6,800 megawatts of power combined. That is more than eight times the size of Vineyard Wind.

Susan Muller, an energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said buying that much wind power will help New England during cold snaps when the energy grid is strained.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter,” she said.

Wind off New England shores, she said, is “like a clutch player in the winter. It shows up almost exactly in sync with periods where we have very low temperatures.”

Muller is urging the states to “go big” by buying as much wind power as possible.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter.”
Susan Muller, energy analyst

Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut cooperated to solicit bids from developers.

Massachusetts and Rhode Island had publicly scheduled their announcements for Aug. 8; Connecticut gave no specific date, saying only that it planned to name winners sometime in the third quarter.

Three companies have submitted bids: Avangrid, Ocean Winds, and Vineyard Offshore. A fourth company, Orsted, bid only in Rhode Island and Connecticut.

In some cases, the limited liability company submitting the application bears a different name from the parent company. SouthCoast Wind Energy LLC applied on behalf of Ocean Winds; Bay State Wind LLC applied on behalf of Orsted.

The winning projects will be built in the designated offshore wind area south of Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

This story was originally published by CAI. It was shared as part of the New England News Collaborative.

Superintendent Dawn Bartz is on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of a legal review that the Smithfield school district hired to investigate the incident of senior football players hazing a Jewish freshman
An independent monitor says the district and RIDE have met the terms of a 2023 settlement that required faster evaluations and placement for 3- to 5-year-olds with disabilities, effectively closing the federal class action case
Food insecurity is getting worse in Rhode Island, and the recent disruption of SNAP benefits is only partly to blame
Public health leader Amy Nunn talks about the ripple effects of federal policy shifts, the threat of SNAP cuts and rising insurance costs, and what Rhode Island can do to protect community health in the months ahead
Attorney General Peter Neronha is negotiating with Prospect Medical to keep the financially troubled hospitals open through the end of the year while a potential buyer works to finalize financing — or another steps in
Ørsted executives say they are ‘committed’ to finishing project despite financial headwinds