New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts

Rhode Island, Connecticut and Massachusetts were originally going to reveal the winning bid on Aug. 8.

Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
Share
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts
Copy

Officials in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut postponed naming winners of regional offshore wind contracts on Aug. 8.

Massachusetts officials said they are delaying the decision for one month to consider the effect of a recent federal grant made to New England states.

The grant will fund regional, on-shore transmission infrastructure for offshore wind.

The three states want to buy up to 6,800 megawatts of power combined. That is more than eight times the size of Vineyard Wind.

Susan Muller, an energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said buying that much wind power will help New England during cold snaps when the energy grid is strained.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter,” she said.

Wind off New England shores, she said, is “like a clutch player in the winter. It shows up almost exactly in sync with periods where we have very low temperatures.”

Muller is urging the states to “go big” by buying as much wind power as possible.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter.”
Susan Muller, energy analyst

Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut cooperated to solicit bids from developers.

Massachusetts and Rhode Island had publicly scheduled their announcements for Aug. 8; Connecticut gave no specific date, saying only that it planned to name winners sometime in the third quarter.

Three companies have submitted bids: Avangrid, Ocean Winds, and Vineyard Offshore. A fourth company, Orsted, bid only in Rhode Island and Connecticut.

In some cases, the limited liability company submitting the application bears a different name from the parent company. SouthCoast Wind Energy LLC applied on behalf of Ocean Winds; Bay State Wind LLC applied on behalf of Orsted.

The winning projects will be built in the designated offshore wind area south of Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

This story was originally published by CAI. It was shared as part of the New England News Collaborative.

The state senator shares his takeaways from the Washington Bridge hearing and weighs in on gun policy, health care strains, and the push for a new medical school at URI
A group of nonprofits from Rhode Island found themselves at the heart of a dispute over food aid that reached all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
New research led by Brown University scientists suggests cannabis may curb short-term alcohol consumption — but raises big questions about swapping one substance for another
Federal budget cuts will yank SNAP, Medicaid from thousands of lawful immigrants
Rhode Island’s junior U.S. Senator says many international leaders at the COP30 conference finally recognized the necessity of addressing the rising cost of property insurance caused by more frequent and intense weather events
Spotted lanternflies, Japanese barberry, Oriental bittersweet – When plants and animals like these invade our environment, they can disrupt other organisms that are native to the region. But can we stop these species? And should we?